Well they contradict even on the basics such as the days major events as the Crucifixion happened. There is also a major problem with the chronology of King Herod and the governor Quirinius who Luke places as contemporaries when in fact they were 10 years or so apart. Nor could Herod have coincided with a Roman taxation of Judaea. These are just a few examples of many but I have no desire to go further on these issues as I respect your views and beliefs.
Inasmuch as the Bible itself has gone through various stages of compilation and translation it is very possible and likely that much has been lost through the ages, not to mention that there are many idioms in that text that have no colloquial meaning for us today. It is often helpful to compare other translations as well as whatever contemporary texts, as well.
Back to education, please do click on the following link to have an idea what subjects are considered "soft" (no, not Beckham Studies again, please!) and which "hard" (e.g. Studies in Purging Parallel Fifths).
Back to education, please do click on the following link to have an idea what subjects are considered "soft" (no, not Beckham Studies again, please!) and which "hard" (e.g. Studies in Purging Parallel Fifths).
Comment