Originally posted by Agnes Selby
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Butchering Mozart Operas
Collapse
X
-
-
As to "shock, horror, scandal", I was of course referring to the tone of the article you posted.
As a (struggling and apparently recovering) formalist, I would clearly prefer opera to be conceived as a bunch of people singing and acting on the stage to orchestral accompaniment that can be reduced to Schenkerian principles of functional harmony.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Philip View PostI did. It struck me as the usual run-of-the-mill conservative stance, even though I may not particularly admire Guth's oeuvre in general.
I also note that the Right Wing Watch organisation takes a dim view of the City Journal's owners, these being The Manhattan Institute for Political Research, an undoubtedly conservative think-tank.'Man know thyself'
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sorrano View PostWithout intention of being offensive, stirring the pot, etc., I might observe that Beethoven, in his day, would have been considered to be fairly left wing, liberal, etc, considering his political views toward Napoleon at the beginning of his campaigns.
The files the Metternich-régime compiled from the late 1810s onwards (it was not too difficult to eavesdrop Beethoven during his frequenting Viennese taverns and free houses ) show that his view mellowed a bit, but never really changed. The Konversationshefte show the same. His opinion regarding Napoleon obviously changed, but not what this Bonaparte originally stood for: liberté, égalité, fraternité.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sorrano View PostWithout intention of being offensive, stirring the pot, etc., I might observe that Beethoven, in his day, would have been considered to be fairly left wing, liberal, etc, considering his political views toward Napoleon at the beginning of his campaigns.'Man know thyself'
Comment
-
I stand corrected, Agnès, Headmaster, et al...
So, you don't like these modern productions. But is anyone going to answer my query above : propose me your own mise en scène for your "fave" opera(s) that would make me want to get out a bit and spend a hefty sum of money rather than stay in with the CD.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Philip View PostI stand corrected, Agnès, Headmaster, et al...
So, you don't like these modern productions. But is anyone going to answer my query above : propose me your own mise en scène for your "fave" opera(s) that would make me want to get out a bit and spend a hefty sum of money rather than stay in with the CD.
I'm not against ALL modern productions as long as they respect the original context instead of a director imposing his own agenda - if people can't cope with Da Ponte and Mozart as written then don't bother, watch something else like big brother - I just think it is absurd for example to have a production set in ancient Rome 'updated' to New York! Quite frankly it's a bit of an insult to suggest that an audience can't relate to another era and has to have it explained to them in a modern way.
Nor do I have an issue with political debate in context - for example clearly 'The Marriage of Figaro' is very political, but it is in reference to pre-revolutionary France, not 21st century social issues which are of a very different order.
I can't propose for you a production to see, because I rarely go myself and because I wouldn't expect you to agree with me - why should you? What is right for you is fine by me. My own criteria would be the composer, conductor, cast, director, venue and reviews!'Man know thyself'
Comment
-
Originally posted by Peter View PostGlad you took your punishment in the right spirit!
I'm not against ALL modern productions as long as they respect the original context instead of a director imposing his own agenda - if people can't cope with Da Ponte and Mozart as written then don't bother, watch something else like big brother - I just think it is absurd for example to have a production set in ancient Rome 'updated' to New York! Quite frankly it's a bit of an insult to suggest that an audience can't relate to another era and has to have it explained to them in a modern way.
Nor do I have an issue with political debate in context - for example clearly 'The Marriage of Figaro' is very political, but it is in reference to pre-revolutionary France, not 21st century social issues which are of a very different order.
I can't propose for you a production to see, because I rarely go myself and because I wouldn't expect you to agree with me - why should you? What is right for you is fine by me. My own criteria would be the composer, conductor, cast, director, venue and reviews!
I don't find it all absurd that an original opera setting can be updated to a more modern context. For example, setting Fidelio in North Korea, or some other totalitarian state, as in my view the "spirit" of the setting/libretto allows for this.
But I am glad to note we agree that Opera is a highly "political" genre. As I said above, if not so, it becomes "zarzuela", a surely highly enjoyable entertainment of musical and stage frippery.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Philip View PostI always take my punishment like a man, Headmaster. Don't forget I was a grammar school boy when corporal punishment was the norm (bloody sadists, some of my teachers were...).
I don't find it all absurd that an original opera setting can be updated to a more modern context. For example, setting Fidelio in North Korea, or some other totalitarian state, as in my view the "spirit" of the setting/libretto allows for this.
But I am glad to note we agree that Opera is a highly "political" genre. As I said above, if not so, it becomes "zarzuela", a surely highly enjoyable entertainment of musical and stage frippery.'Man know thyself'
Comment
-
Originally posted by Peter View PostI didn't realise you were that old! [...]
Comment
-
Originally posted by Preston View PostAs for school, you are not alone, trust me on that one, . Interesting that your entire life is now based around school!
My university years on the other hand were bliss.
Comment
Comment