Originally posted by Chris:
While I love Mozart's music very much, I very definitely see Beethoven as the superior composer. To me it seems that Beethoven never wrote a single note that wasn't carefully considered and absolutely perfect in its place. Mozart on the other hand, had quite a bit of stuff that was just kind of thrown out there, without much care, or so it seems to my ears. Sometimes when I am listening to Mozart, I think to myself, "How wonderful it would have been if he had done this instead." But with Beethoven, every bit of potential seems painstakingly squeezed from the material, making each individual work a true labor of love. That, to me, is the difference.
While I love Mozart's music very much, I very definitely see Beethoven as the superior composer. To me it seems that Beethoven never wrote a single note that wasn't carefully considered and absolutely perfect in its place. Mozart on the other hand, had quite a bit of stuff that was just kind of thrown out there, without much care, or so it seems to my ears. Sometimes when I am listening to Mozart, I think to myself, "How wonderful it would have been if he had done this instead." But with Beethoven, every bit of potential seems painstakingly squeezed from the material, making each individual work a true labor of love. That, to me, is the difference.
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/15736
Relative to the above quote by Chris, Brendel points out that Mozart, Haydn and J.S. Bach all had many pots cooking on the stove at one time, to strict deadlines, and therefore may have let some mediocre movements slip by into their ouvres. Whereas although Beethoven also was usually juggling works (and publishers), he was perhaps more self-consciously an Artist with a capital A than the others, and took care to let NOTHING in that was not of first quality. Unlike Bach and Haydn, he was his own boss and could set his own schedule. Although Mozart was also his own boss, his career was a frantic and pathetic search for ever more commissions.
Comment