Whilst adding the addendum to my previous entry, I thought to mention my current favorite Moonlight sonata interpretation. It then dawned on me that I don't have one. I've never had one. I never fully came to grips with the work, chiefly the first movement from which its pseudonym derives. It's not that I dislike it in any way. I just never regarded as highly as most music lovers seem to.
Thinking on this, I decided to visit Andras Schiff's lecture-recital on the Moonlight. Like all his Beethoven sonata discussions it's well worth hearing. Of special interest to me, he champions an interpretation of movement one rather different from what is normally heard. He justifies himself well, both orally and by example. Listening to his extended excerpts I quickly realized that Schiff's concept of the movement appeals to me more than the traditional slow(er) approach. (For what it's worth, Brautigam's is far from the slowest first movement I've heard, but it's slow compared to Schiff.)
I also had time to finish out the lecture on Op.2 No.1, and went on to hear the other opus two lectures.
Thinking on this, I decided to visit Andras Schiff's lecture-recital on the Moonlight. Like all his Beethoven sonata discussions it's well worth hearing. Of special interest to me, he champions an interpretation of movement one rather different from what is normally heard. He justifies himself well, both orally and by example. Listening to his extended excerpts I quickly realized that Schiff's concept of the movement appeals to me more than the traditional slow(er) approach. (For what it's worth, Brautigam's is far from the slowest first movement I've heard, but it's slow compared to Schiff.)
I also had time to finish out the lecture on Op.2 No.1, and went on to hear the other opus two lectures.
Comment