Since Gluck's music has all the harmony and sonority of the full Classical style, and Gluck was an acknowledged master by the time Haydn started writing his mature works, why is Gluck not more widely acknowledged as an important founder of the style, perhaps the most significant founder?
Of course this cannot include the structural elements such as sonata form because Gluck composed opera. But the style, feeling, orchestration, horizontal writing, melody, almost complete discarding of Baroque and transitional elements, seem to be all there.
Of course this cannot include the structural elements such as sonata form because Gluck composed opera. But the style, feeling, orchestration, horizontal writing, melody, almost complete discarding of Baroque and transitional elements, seem to be all there.
Comment