Many people is being frank in what regards Bach's music, so I'd like to make some statements too. First, it goes without saying that every composition of his is not equally worthy. I'm I listening to the much praised suites and sonaten for solo violin. This music has very little appeal to me (though repeated audition could enhance it). Perhaps if I like the chaconne it's because we listen to it so many times, though this may be a cause for the contrary effect. Example: Eine Klaine Nacht Music in G major.
Before Casals, people used to consider the cello sonaten as exercises. And this is precisely what Bach could have written tehm for. Who can say for sure? And the same goes for these violin compositions. The partitas and suites for clavier are more digestible music because they include its own harmonization. Many of them are deligtful, as the opening movement of the English suite no.3. In fact, they are electrifying at the same time.
The organ music if a chapter apart. Be it a chorale-prelude or one of the imposing preludes and fugues, one cannot miss them. Pardon me Quijote. I know you have a problem with this instrument. And what about the passions and the B minor Mass? Or the magnificat? Everyone has heard the magnificat once in his life. Yet I had not heard a work about these works whose hearing makes you realize that There are more things in heaven ... (do not remember the whole verses). Some people have been able to see the Earth from outer space and have got a feeling of their own insignificance, the sensation of being very small. And is this not the same feeling experienced by hering the opening bars of the Mass. Or the impression of something very deep, of infinite tenderness that is happening down there at the orchestra, when listening Matthaus Passion's introduction (one thing that always strikes me is a very long pedal in the basses which runs uninterrupted until the last few bars).
However, this poster is not to be taken very seriously, given he is also impermeable to the last sonatas and string quartets and, therefore, shows a poor musical intelligence and a doubtful taste. In a few words ... Much about the Beatles, little about Bach.
Before Casals, people used to consider the cello sonaten as exercises. And this is precisely what Bach could have written tehm for. Who can say for sure? And the same goes for these violin compositions. The partitas and suites for clavier are more digestible music because they include its own harmonization. Many of them are deligtful, as the opening movement of the English suite no.3. In fact, they are electrifying at the same time.
The organ music if a chapter apart. Be it a chorale-prelude or one of the imposing preludes and fugues, one cannot miss them. Pardon me Quijote. I know you have a problem with this instrument. And what about the passions and the B minor Mass? Or the magnificat? Everyone has heard the magnificat once in his life. Yet I had not heard a work about these works whose hearing makes you realize that There are more things in heaven ... (do not remember the whole verses). Some people have been able to see the Earth from outer space and have got a feeling of their own insignificance, the sensation of being very small. And is this not the same feeling experienced by hering the opening bars of the Mass. Or the impression of something very deep, of infinite tenderness that is happening down there at the orchestra, when listening Matthaus Passion's introduction (one thing that always strikes me is a very long pedal in the basses which runs uninterrupted until the last few bars).
However, this poster is not to be taken very seriously, given he is also impermeable to the last sonatas and string quartets and, therefore, shows a poor musical intelligence and a doubtful taste. In a few words ... Much about the Beatles, little about Bach.
Comment