What do you think of Pulcinella, Roehre?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What are you listening to now?
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by Sorrano View PostThis morning:
Schubert: The Wanderer Fantasy
The radio announcer introduced this piece as one that was so difficult that Schubert could not play it. That is the first time I've even thought much about Schubert as a pianist. How good was he, anyone know?
All the song accompaniments e.g. were within his professional range.
But he himself admitted that the Wanderer-phantasy and also the three last great piano sonatas were (literally) byond his grasp.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Enrique View PostWhat do you think of Pulcinella, Roehre?
How well Stravinsky put some orchestral flesh onto the originals can only be appreciated as soon as you listen to the Suite italienne, which is a reduction of mvts from Pulcinella for violin and piano (an arrangement agreed by IS for cello and piano exists too). There the originals are much more shining through the stravinskyan music, and IMO are better than this score of Stravinsky's.
Pulcinella = pure Stravinsky based on other people's music
Suite italienne = other people's music not brilliantly (not to say: badly) arranged by StravinskyLast edited by Roehre; 08-09-2012, 03:35 PM.
Comment
-
I once borrowed the score from the Conservatory library, but there was maestro Jacobi, who had the counterpoint chair, and in a few moments we were both singing (= sing the music without the text) some fragments. He knew it by heart, from which I learned I was not the only one. I do not know what I like best: the instrumental sections or the vocal ones.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Roehre View PostSchubert was a pianist capable of entertaining his friends by sheer endlessly playing the piano in seriously and less-seriously meant repertoire.
All the song accompaniments e.g. were within his professional range.
But he himself admitted that the Wanderer-phantasy and also the three last great piano sonatas were (literally) byond his grasp.
Comment
-
Today:
Bach, Johann Christoph Friedrich (1732-1795)
Ino - solo cantata for soprano and orchestra (R3:TtN)
Fruhling:
Trio for clarinet, cello and piano opus.40 (R3:TtN)
Holliger:
Induuchlen (2004)
Ma’mounia (2002)
Balakauskas:
Opera strumentale – 5 fragments for orchestra (1987)
Rihm:
Wölfl-Liederbuch (1981)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Roehre View PostSchubert was a pianist capable of entertaining his friends by sheer endlessly playing the piano in seriously and less-seriously meant repertoire.
All the song accompaniments e.g. were within his professional range.
But he himself admitted that the Wanderer-phantasy and also the three last great piano sonatas were (literally) byond his grasp.
No contemporary account survives of these historic performances.
Comment
-
Today:
Zemlinsky:
Yankee Doodle (movement for string quartet, 1927)
Wiggins:
Battle of Manassas (1861)
Berlioz
Irlande opus.2 (1832)
La Captive (Reverie) Opus12 (1848 orchestral version)
Le Jeune patre breton - romance Opus13/4 (p.1850)
Le Chasseur danois Opus19/6 (p.1850)
Zaide (Bolero) Opus19/1 (p.1850)
Kancheli:
Light mourning (1985)
Beethoven;
Symphony no.5 in c op.67
Comment
Comment