I am looking forward to seeing the work live in just a few hours - I will report on the experience!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Grosse Fugue
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Preston View PostWould you describe it as pleasant or unpleasant? Peaceful or not? Dark and peaceful? Light and peaceful? Dark and painful? Light and painful? Etc.
I've read that it has been described as both (pleasant and unpleasant) by different great composers? Though, I may be wrong. Schumann at one point, I think?, described it as sublime beauty - perhaps, he was right?
It sounds twisted and dark to me, hard to enjoy, so, I guess unpleasant? Though, I can see great beauty in great power, and - darkness. So maybe one day it will sound beautiful to me.
Maybe it cannot be described? But, my point is that if it is as complex as music can be - than the true sound of the Grosse Fugue is beyond 99.999etc. of humanity. Because - we would have to understand all music, imo, to a degree so high that not only 12 tone was completely understood - and/but - any music that could come from it, that is 12 tone - all music - or - most all feelings that can be felt by humanity. So, that is why I said it almost divine. I just think that if it is that complex than regarding that piece it cannot be understood unless you understand it on Beethoven's level?
So, you may see how I find it confusing? I feel it - though I know I do not feel it correctly.Last edited by Sorrano; 01-07-2012, 07:47 PM. Reason: Not much good with the placing of the quote markers!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sorrano View Post
Repeated listening will help solidify impressions and understand better how you choose to react to what you hear. I would not describe it as sublime beauty; I will leave that description to the preceding Cavatina movement. But it is uplifting to me and that is what counts to me.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chris View PostWell, the concert was very good. The Grosse Fuge played by an orchestra instead of a string quartet is, while not the ideal medium, interesting. Definitely powerful, though not as "gritty". I found it a bit slow, but not as slow as I feared it would be.
Comment
-
Just strings. They basically just played the original string quartet version with multiple instruments to a part. The only exception was the double basses - they didn't always play with the cellos. The conductor also said they added some dynamics that weren't in the score. I don't know - maybe that was necessary with the larger forces so all the loudness didn't wear the listeners down.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chris View PostJust strings. They basically just played the original string quartet version with multiple instruments to a part. The only exception was the double basses - they didn't always play with the cellos. The conductor also said they added some dynamics that weren't in the score. I don't know - maybe that was necessary with the larger forces so all the loudness didn't wear the listeners down.
Comment
-
I approached this gigantic work first by Beethoven's wonderful piano version op.134, which Hofrat once sent to me, and here especially starting with the "heavenly" and transcending middle section!
After I got really into this I also could wholeheartely receive the whole original quartett version. So this work has become for me one of the real peaks of Beethoven's heritage!
Comment
Comment