Italian director Riccardo Chailly has recorded for DECCA and now he's on tour with new version of Symphonies, veeery quick according to the original scores: why so? Opinions: he was deaf - or: he didn't manage the metronome well. A discussion will be opened soon in musical environment. I cannot discuss it, btw I prefer Karajan to Toscanini.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Chailly lets Beethoven run
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by terry View PostItalian director Riccardo Chailly has recorded for DECCA and now he's on tour with new version of Symphonies, veeery quick according to the original scores: why so? Opinions: he was deaf - or: he didn't manage the metronome well. A discussion will be opened soon in musical environment. I cannot discuss it, btw I prefer Karajan to Toscanini.- I hope, or I could not live. - written by H.G. Wells
-
Originally posted by Chris View PostI don't see how being deaf could possibly cause him to be unaware of the effects of his indicated tempos.'Man know thyself'
Comment
-
Originally posted by Peter View PostExactly and it isn't rocket science either - Crotchet beat (quarter note)= 60 is beating out seconds. I find it bizarre that so called musical scholars can accept that Beethoven can produce the Missa Solemnis, 9th symphony and last quartets whilst stone deaf but then suggest he didn't have a clue about his tempi!
Further, we know that even Stravinsky and Bartok gave metronome markings for (some?) of their works, but on record they are known not to have even respected their own indications!
Comment
-
I am glad though that even when there is a metronome indication, there is often (if not always) an adjoining subjective (and hence very imprecise) adjective such as "allegro", or "adagio ma non troppo", or "très vif" which renders the exercise wholly unlike rocket science.
Speaking from very vague (and probably defective) memory here, I remember reading some article that suggested the "allegros" in Mozart/Haydn/Beethoven's day were taken quicker than they are today. What that idea is based on I cannot imagine!
However, what I call "fast" might seem rushed (or slowish) to other ears. Who can say?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Philip View PostSpeaking from very vague (and probably defective) memory here, I remember reading some article that suggested the "allegros" in Mozart/Haydn/Beethoven's day were taken quicker than they are today. What that idea is based on I cannot imagine!
However, what I call "fast" might seem rushed (or slowish) to other ears. Who can say?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Philip View PostStill, some of B's metronome markings do raise certain eyebrows, wouldn't you say? I am reminded of one of Andras Schiff's lecture-recitals (for the Opus 2, N° 1 / F minor) where he tells us that B's pupil Czerny left us two editions on "the correct performance of B's piano sonatas" : in the first edition he indicated what he thought were the correct metronome speeds, yet in his second edition (some 20 years later) gave completely different values. One would think that Czerny would have been a reliable source.
Further, we know that even Stravinsky and Bartok gave metronome markings for (some?) of their works, but on record they are known not to have even respected their own indications!'Man know thyself'
Comment
-
Originally posted by Peter View PostCzerny reliable? You only have to look at his dreadful Bach edition to wonder about that! Is it really conceivable that Beethoven had no idea what tempi he was suggesting? I mean would he have been so careless about the matter not to have noticed a faulty metronome? Most musicians have some idea don't they of metronome speeds without actually using it?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sorrano View PostIn trying to determine tempi of various contemporary (to Beethoven, etc.) piano works I've gotten very mixed results in fast and slow(ish) allegros as far as the recorded literature goes. I do not find a lot of consistency, often with a same work.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Peter View PostIs it really conceivable that Beethoven [or Stravinsky or Bartok] had no idea what tempi [they were] suggesting? I mean would [they] have been so careless about the matter not to have noticed a faulty metronome? Most musicians have some idea don't they of metronome speeds without actually using it?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Philip View PostAnd thank God!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sorrano View PostI think it's interesting, too, how one can find a great deal of satisfaction with one work, yet very varied tempi. Celibadache, for example, (I refer specifically to Tchaikovsky's 5th Symphony) may have a tempo slow to one extreme while someone else is the opposite, yet both performances work very well.
Comment
Comment