I hadn't finished, hah!
This 1892 score bears therefore many such dynamic markings that make explicit what was implicit in performance practice. But that is hardly interesting. What is more relevant to HIP practice fans is that Bruckner went on to refine (in this 1892 revision) the tempi markings, and how the accelerandi, the a tempos, the cresc., the descr., and a whole host of other instructions were to be played. The 1892 version (however dubious its authorship may be) actually gives us an insight to performance practice at the time, and for this alone is a valuable source document.
This 1892 score bears therefore many such dynamic markings that make explicit what was implicit in performance practice. But that is hardly interesting. What is more relevant to HIP practice fans is that Bruckner went on to refine (in this 1892 revision) the tempi markings, and how the accelerandi, the a tempos, the cresc., the descr., and a whole host of other instructions were to be played. The 1892 version (however dubious its authorship may be) actually gives us an insight to performance practice at the time, and for this alone is a valuable source document.
Comment