I didn't vote, which is a terrrible shame, I'm sure you all agree. I'm all for the popular vote, because it is meaningless but good-natured fun (unlike the vote in Germany in the 30s). I am a little bit glad that Bruckner features on Rutradelusasa's list!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Vote in NY Times Poll of Top Composers
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Bonn1827Oh, but this is what "philistines" do - they are like sheep and follow the leader, especially on musical matters!! Or, perhaps, more like lemmings. We leave the lofty ideals and actions to the more enlightened amongst us!!
Come on, Philip, I'm having a bit of fun here myself..........
Comment
-
Originally posted by Philip View PostI didn't vote, which is a terrrible shame, I'm sure you all agree. I'm all for the popular vote, because it is meaningless but good-natured fun (unlike the vote in Germany in the 30s). I am a little bit glad that Bruckner features on Rutradelusasa's list!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sorrano View PostNor did I, which isn't so much a shame. It's interesting to me to see how people do vote, but in the end it changes nothing as far as I am concerned. However, maybe I should have voted to get Bruckner another vote. Aren't the three B's Beethoven, Buxtehude, and Bruckner?
Sorrano, I'm really rediscovering Brucker 8 and 5. Who needs women with such music?
Comment
Comment