Originally posted by Preston
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
of these 3 modern pianos which do you feel is suited best for playing Beethoven...
Collapse
X
-
'Man know thyself'
-
I have always found the fortepiano rather thin and ugly sounding. Solo piano works or chamber music I much prefer on the modern piano. The only time it works for me is when it mixes with the orchestra. Not in Beethoven's concerti so much, but in Mozart's, yes. I love Malcolm Bilson's period instrument set of the Mozart piano concerti.
Comment
-
I cannot wholly remember the precise sound of the fortepiano (so, I will listen momentarily). Though, what I do remember is it sounds somewhat rigid. Even when you try to play pianissimo there is a sharper sound, than the desired effect, it seems. It seems as though it sounds weak, also.
Not, that the fortepiano does not have good qualities, it became the- piano- one of my favorite instruments. Just that the modern seems so much better- as far as tone, bass, weight, depth, etc.- I hope, or I could not live. - written by H.G. Wells
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chris View PostI have always found the fortepiano rather thin and ugly sounding. Solo piano works or chamber music I much prefer on the modern piano. The only time it works for me is when it mixes with the orchestra. Not in Beethoven's concerti so much, but in Mozart's, yes. I love Malcolm Bilson's period instrument set of the Mozart piano concerti.'Man know thyself'
Comment
-
Peter;
The Beethoven Broadwood was completely refurbished in the early 1990's, so a recording or performance on the Broadwood in the 1980's would "put you off" while a performance or a recording on the same Broadwood after the overhaul would sound "tremendous.""Is it not strange that sheep guts should hale souls out of men's bodies?"
Comment
-
Originally posted by Peter View PostI can't agree - Would Mozart, Haydn and Beethoven have written for an 'ugly sounding' instrument?
On another note, speaking of the word "ugly" (I prefer unattactive, )- didn't Glen Gould call Beethoven's music ugly?
I think this is down to the type of fortepiano used and oiur conditioning to the modern sound.- I hope, or I could not live. - written by H.G. Wells
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hofrat View PostPeter;
The Beethoven Broadwood was completely refurbished in the early 1990's, so a recording or performance on the Broadwood in the 1980's would "put you off" while a performance or a recording on the same Broadwood after the overhaul would sound "tremendous."'Man know thyself'
Comment
-
Originally posted by Preston View PostThat is a good point.
On another note, speaking of the word "ugly" (I prefer unattactive, )- didn't Glen Gould call Beethoven's music ugly?
Interesting and good point, again! Though, while you are right- in a more general sense, do you not think the fortepiano has been developed into a more masterful piano, and more mastered sound?
The Fortepiano (old instrument) as distinct from the Pianoforte (modern) was by the 1820s pretty well developed, after all it had been around for over 100 years! Clearly the modern instrument allows for more power and was favoured by later composers such as Liszt, although his own performing career would have been mainly on the old wooden framed pianos, as opposed to the iron framed of the modern. All I would say is that it is a different sound (and one the composers of the day wrote for), not necessarily more masterful - the modern piano though is without doubt and instrument of superb beauty and design.
Few can go to the expense of owning all these different instruments so performers should not deny themselves this music (including that of Bach, Handel and Scarlatti) on grounds of authenticity.
We should and do have the opportunity now to hear works performed on both - nobody would advocate playing Prokofiev on an old fortepiano, but we should hear Mozart, Haydn and Beethoven as they intended their music. Chopin as well on an Erard or Pleyel is a wonderful aural experience.'Man know thyself'
Comment
-
Originally posted by Peter View PostI can't agree - Would Mozart, Haydn and Beethoven have written for an 'ugly sounding' instrument?
I suppose time will tell. Will the fortepiano ever serve a significant purpose in music again aside from allowing us to hear older compositions as their composers did? I doubt it, but we shall see.
Comment
-
I've never liked the sound of fortepiano recordings until I heard Paul Badura-Skoda's set on Astree. The Brautigam set is highly praised but it ended up getting on my nerves. The Badura-Skoda set is recorded on 7 different fortepianos, each contemporary to the sonata performed. Also it's a very dry, intimate recording, so it doesn't sound like some antique parlor instrument being played in the middle of Carnegie Hall. On my iPod I keep this set as well as 5 other cycles on modern pianos...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Peter View PostI'm not sure what Gould said - a fine artist, but he was rather strange and some of his own interpretations rather eccentric shall we say!
In short I quite like Gould. He was a brilliant pianist and a brilliant man, imo. And, he is probably the pianist I like most.
There are interviews all over YT with Gould. Here is one where he speaks about the writing of a fugue:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5s4TKOaUZ7cLast edited by Preston; 08-16-2010, 12:11 PM.- I hope, or I could not live. - written by H.G. Wells
Comment
Comment