This is interesting. I was reading a book today on my travel in to London on the tube train 'Debussy - His Life and Mind' (E Lockspeiser - Volume 1) - He is recorded as having had the following conversation with Ernest Guiraud about the question of key signatures and art -
GUIRAUD - You have said Monsieur Debussy that the cor anglais solo in the 3rd act of Wagner's 'Tristan' is a classical aria, an academic 'exercise'. But it doesn't in any way suggest Beethoven.
DEBUSSY - That's because you do not hear the harmony beneath it. But look further. A COMPOSER LIKE BERLIOZ IS MUCH FURTHER REMOVED FROM BACH AND MOZART THAN WAGNER. HE IS LESS TONAL THAN WAGNER THOUGH WAGNER IS MORE ACCOMPLISHED IN TRANSITION FROM MAJOR TO MINOR
GUIRAUD - That seems harsh - it's constantly chromatic. How can you call that classical ?
DEBUSSY - But 'classical' signifies major and minor. In the classical style chords are resolved. The classical style implies near modulations (a closed circle). The term 'romantic' is a label that to my mind has no real significance. The language of Schumann, Berlioz and men like Liszt is the classical language, I hear in them the same sort of music.
GUIRAUD - But this insipid, continuous music. No scenes, no cuts. You can't say it is anything like Mozart.
DEBUSSY - I shouldn't say it is the opposite of Mozart. It's a later development - Wagner develops in the classical manner. Wagner merely abandoned the perpetual perfect cadences and the hateful six-four chord. Supposing Mozart had the idea of writing a whole operatic act in one continuous movement - do you think he would have been able to achieve it ? For his was the convention of separate arias and four bar phrases. Again, Wagner develops in the classical style. In the place of the architectural themes of a symphony occurring at specified points he has themes instead that represent things and people, but he develops these themes in a symphonic manner. He derives from Bach and Beethoven (as we see in Tristan and Meistersinger)- not to speak of his orchestra which is really a development and enlargement of the classicla orchestra.
I am not misled by equal temperament. To follow rythms is stifling. Rythms cannot be constructed within bars.... Relative keys are to me sheer nonsense. Music is neither major NOR minor. Minor thirds and major thirds should be combined and modulation thus becomes much more flexible. The mode is that which one chooses at the moment. Themes suggest their own orchestral colouring. I tell you that Music cannot be learned.
GUIRAUD - Oh, come now ! You are forgetting that you yourself were 10 years at the Conservatoire.
DEBUSSY - That is true enough. I feel free because I have been through the mill of the academic side. I don't write in the fugal style (precisely) because I know it so well.
[This message has been edited by robert newman (edited 02-03-2006).]
Comment