I have the CD of Beethoven's 10th Symphony, 1st movement. That right -- the 10th. Its a "realization" by a Beethoven scholar/conductor based on old and newly discovered sketches. I think we all know B had plans for other symphonies before he was snatched away to the big yonder. Oh! If only he could've hung on for just a few more years! Not fair!
Anyway, I'm curious to know what you all think about this CD. The recording's been available for some time now and even merits a great review in the Penguin Guide (the mother of all classical CD review books). I enjoy the novelty of it and the sound is intriguing but could it really be labeled "Beethovenian?"
It's impossible, of course, to know really what was in the Maestro's head and I wouldn't be surprised if the 10th was meant to be something more introspective or less "grand" than the 9th. Seems that B's pattern has been to sort of ease back a little after a groundbreaker, sort of unwind and smell the flowers before the next storm -- look at the sunny 4th in the wake of the explosive 3rd, the Pastoral after the devastating 5th or the classically retro-8th after the fanfare of the 7th.
Then again, at the time of his Third and Last Period, Beethoven had simply surpassed this realm. He'd become like an oracle with no limits to his ability. It's no surprise a lot of people say his last string quartets are akin to listening to the voice of God or the Higher Power. So I'm not so sure Beethoven would've used the "ease back before the next volley" approach this time around. What do the rest of you think?
For me personally, the supposed 10th Symphony has only the vaguest glimmers of HIS 10th symphony. Somehow it just doesn't sound quite "authentic" and I can't say why really. I'm no scholar certainly, I'm going solely on my ears and heart.
Anyway, I'm curious to know what you all think about this CD. The recording's been available for some time now and even merits a great review in the Penguin Guide (the mother of all classical CD review books). I enjoy the novelty of it and the sound is intriguing but could it really be labeled "Beethovenian?"
It's impossible, of course, to know really what was in the Maestro's head and I wouldn't be surprised if the 10th was meant to be something more introspective or less "grand" than the 9th. Seems that B's pattern has been to sort of ease back a little after a groundbreaker, sort of unwind and smell the flowers before the next storm -- look at the sunny 4th in the wake of the explosive 3rd, the Pastoral after the devastating 5th or the classically retro-8th after the fanfare of the 7th.
Then again, at the time of his Third and Last Period, Beethoven had simply surpassed this realm. He'd become like an oracle with no limits to his ability. It's no surprise a lot of people say his last string quartets are akin to listening to the voice of God or the Higher Power. So I'm not so sure Beethoven would've used the "ease back before the next volley" approach this time around. What do the rest of you think?
For me personally, the supposed 10th Symphony has only the vaguest glimmers of HIS 10th symphony. Somehow it just doesn't sound quite "authentic" and I can't say why really. I'm no scholar certainly, I'm going solely on my ears and heart.
Comment