I find the task of rating them in any order virtually impossible. The only ones that stand out - in terms of scale and ambition - are the Eroica and the Ninth, which I have always thought were the greatest two symphonies of them all. I still can't separate them!
As for the other seven, I consider them to be the equal of each other. Each one has its own unique voice, its own character, and I can't help but feel rather protective of them. Almost paternal, as B was himself, especially towards the less-admired ones. If someone says one, say, the Fourth, isn't as good as the Seventh, I feel as though I have to jealously defend it - pointing out its best points without disparaging the other (for which I have the same affection).
Beethoven's Nine Symphonies represent something truly great in human achievement, comparable to Shakespeare's plays, or even putting a man on the moon! They should each be celebrated as something essential to the whole canon.
Did any of this make sense?
Daz
------------------
Seizing fate by the throat...
As for the other seven, I consider them to be the equal of each other. Each one has its own unique voice, its own character, and I can't help but feel rather protective of them. Almost paternal, as B was himself, especially towards the less-admired ones. If someone says one, say, the Fourth, isn't as good as the Seventh, I feel as though I have to jealously defend it - pointing out its best points without disparaging the other (for which I have the same affection).
Beethoven's Nine Symphonies represent something truly great in human achievement, comparable to Shakespeare's plays, or even putting a man on the moon! They should each be celebrated as something essential to the whole canon.
Did any of this make sense?
Daz
------------------
Seizing fate by the throat...
Comment