I bought this book which has every Prelude/Etude he did, because I wanted to see what this stuff looks like on paper when listening to it. I listened through all the preludes/etudes while looking at the sheet music and cannot really tell the difference in terms of what is actually there. I know etudes are meant to work on a certain aspect of technique, but both forms look indistinguishable on paper. Both are very breif, both are very repetetive, they seem to all declare one idea initially and continue it through-out. I thought beforehand that etudes would be naturally more difficult, but then I hear etudes (like #3 op. 10) that look and sound much easier than some of the preludes (like the first of the set of 24).
So basically, what is the difference, if there is any? I may be missing some structural subtlety, because I havent music theory analyzed the works, I just followed them with the music.
So basically, what is the difference, if there is any? I may be missing some structural subtlety, because I havent music theory analyzed the works, I just followed them with the music.
Comment