Since christians beleive in the same God the commandment is speakin of, i beleive it's completely irrilevant WHEN it was first coined.
What does ?!?
I analize Beethoven's true standing on the matter on who he was, and a PERSONAL conception of things he propably had about life and his own religious feelings.
In times where everybody was thought to be a Christian, Beethoven merely followed the current cultural trend.
He was a christian, but does listening to the Great Mass rapresents proof of his devotion ?!?
I say it doesn't, and that's what i'm contesting here, again, because of who he was.
I never did say he never beleived in God or that he was not a religious individuals, only that his personal conception of God doesn't express itself with sermons or scriptures, he didn't follow his heart that way.
In times where everybody was thought to be a Christian, Beethoven merely followed the current cultural trend.
He was a christian, but does listening to the Great Mass rapresents proof of his devotion ?!?
I say it doesn't, and that's what i'm contesting here, again, because of who he was.
I never did say he never beleived in God or that he was not a religious individuals, only that his personal conception of God doesn't express itself with sermons or scriptures, he didn't follow his heart that way.
Saying that the Mass is proof of his religious feelings (by mere force of it's aestetics) it's missinterpretating Beethoven inner self and the way he looked at life.
You don't praise God by abiding to arbitrary aestetical values, it's something that runs deep inside and i think that Beethoven expressed that feeling in ALL his music, that, and hundreds of other sensations as well.
It's ridicolous to think the Mass rapresents a testament of his devotion just because it 'sounds' religious, the current connotations of what sounds religious it's a completely arbitrary conception.
You don't praise God by abiding to arbitrary aestetical values, it's something that runs deep inside and i think that Beethoven expressed that feeling in ALL his music, that, and hundreds of other sensations as well.
It's ridicolous to think the Mass rapresents a testament of his devotion just because it 'sounds' religious, the current connotations of what sounds religious it's a completely arbitrary conception.
If he wanted to 'praise' God that way, he would have written a lot more than a couple of Masses...
...he would took communtion, he would have followed sermons, you name it.
But he didn't, because his relation was purely presonal.
Everytime he walked by a church, he didn't rush in to 'praise' God, he propably talked to God within himself...
Everytime he walked by a church, he didn't rush in to 'praise' God, he propably talked to God within himself...
[This message has been edited by Chris (edited January 31, 2004).]
Comment