Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2021 Chopin Competition, Warsaw

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by Schenkerian View Post
    Oh, so it's probably corrupt. How very disappointing for the music tragic like myself. Thanks for the information. Of course, some celebrated names have missed out on competitions.
    Indeed there is no escaping the toxicity of human nature, even in music! Interestingly it was the 3rd prize winner in that 2010 competition Daniil Trifonov who went on to have the stella career!
    'Man know thyself'

    Comment


      #32
      I particularly like the combo of Trifonov and Babayan as seen here in this performance of Rachmaninov:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSIdYk6yi30

      Sergei Babayan is a former teacher of Daniil Trifonov.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by Schenkerian View Post
        I particularly like the combo of Trifonov and Babayan as seen here in this performance of Rachmaninov:

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSIdYk6yi30

        Sergei Babayan is a former teacher of Daniil Trifonov.
        Yes beautiful playing of a piece I'm not familiar with. Thanks for that.
        'Man know thyself'

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by Peter View Post
          Yes I think many musicians have mixed feelings about these events, though of course they do reveal great talents. Garrick Ohlsson talks about his own experiences and postulates that Chopin would have hated it!
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTYz...=tonebasePiano
          I don't watch these events. As another poster said, it's all kind of a "blood sport", a sort of "olympics". No doubt such competitions provide a platform for emerging talents, but really if such or such a pianist ends up in 2nd or 3rd position who really cares, they are all extremely talented.
          I think we should revert to "improvisation challenges" as happened in Vienna whilst Beethoven was there.

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by Quijote View Post

            I don't watch these events. As another poster said, it's all kind of a "blood sport", a sort of "olympics". No doubt such competitions provide a platform for emerging talents, but really if such or such a pianist ends up in 2nd or 3rd position who really cares, they are all extremely talented.
            I think we should revert to "improvisation challenges" as happened in Vienna whilst Beethoven was there.
            I'm inclined to agree - don't forget Handel and Scarlatti!
            'Man know thyself'

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by Peter View Post

              I'm inclined to agree - don't forget Handel and Scarlatti!
              Hah! Don't forget Beethoven and Steibelt. I'd give all my limbs to have been there!

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by Peter View Post

                Yes beautiful playing of a piece I'm not familiar with. Thanks for that.
                Actually, I'm very partial to the musicianship of Sergei Babayan. Here's a performance of him with Trifonov in New York playing the complete Rachmaninov Suite for 2 Pianos, Op. 17 which is, IMO, sadly affected by the very dry acoustic: it opens in a percussive way I'm convinced the composer wouldn't have wanted. Also, the second movement just runs too fast for my taste. But the virtuosity on display here is phenomenal. Great music too. And when I think of my own woeful sight-reading....!! And who needs a page-turner like Trifonov has here; he should have bashed the score flat at the spine before the start! Sergei's turner has the right method.

                The final movement here is just something else on another level!!

                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61bujkT_uaU
                Last edited by Schenkerian; 10-13-2021, 10:28 PM.

                Comment


                  #38
                  I've never understood the final movement of Chopin's Sonata No. 2: the very brief nature of it and the structural incompatibility with the rest of the sonata.

                  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJEQqcw-830

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by Schenkerian View Post

                    Actually, I'm very partial to the musicianship of Sergei Babayan. Here's a performance of him with Trifonov in New York playing the complete Rachmaninov Suite for 2 Pianos, Op. 17 which is, IMO, sadly affected by the very dry acoustic: it opens in a percussive way I'm convinced the composer wouldn't have wanted. Also, the second movement just runs too fast for my taste. But the virtuosity on display here is phenomenal. Great music too. And when I think of my own woeful sight-reading....!! And who needs a page-turner like Trifonov has here; he should have bashed the score flat at the spine before the start! Sergei's turner has the right method.

                    The final movement here is just something else on another level!!

                    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61bujkT_uaU
                    I don't believe they could be sight reading this! I wouldn't blame the page turner, it's more likely Trifinov's fault for not creasing the spine of the pages properly in advance (assuming it's his own copy used for practice).
                    'Man know thyself'

                    Comment


                      #40
                      They're giving a pretty poor impression of musicians who AREN'T sight-reading!!!

                      Comment


                        #41
                        Sight reading is playing it for the first time never having seen the score before, unthinkable that they haven't practiced this together - I simply think they are not playing from memory and relying on the score.
                        'Man know thyself'

                        Comment


                          #42
                          Originally posted by Peter View Post
                          Sight reading is playing it for the first time never having seen the score before, unthinkable that they haven't practiced this together - I simply think they are not playing from memory and relying on the score.
                          I've always thought sight-reading refers to the first you mention and also to the second. But apparently not. What about Liszt who was said to be able to perform from sight-reading on first contact with a new piece?

                          Comment


                            #43
                            Originally posted by Schenkerian View Post

                            I've always thought sight-reading refers to the first you mention and also to the second. But apparently not. What about Liszt who was said to be able to perform from sight-reading on first contact with a new piece?
                            Yes well Liszt was Liszt and his sight reading from manuscript of the Grieg piano concerto whilst giving a running commentary is legendary. I think the issue here is as there are 2 pianists they must have rehearsed this together prior to performance. I simply think neither were playing from memory which is why the score was necessary.
                            'Man know thyself'

                            Comment


                              #44
                              Originally posted by Peter View Post

                              Yes well Liszt was Liszt and his sight reading from manuscript of the Grieg piano concerto whilst giving a running commentary is legendary. I think the issue here is as there are 2 pianists they must have rehearsed this together prior to performance. I simply think neither were playing from memory which is why the score was necessary.
                              Despite any rehearsals, which I agree would have taken place (for timing alone) you can still see that they're both reading the score all the time at incredible speed.

                              Comment


                                #45
                                Originally posted by Peter View Post
                                Sight reading is playing it for the first time never having seen the score before, unthinkable that they haven't practiced this together - I simply think they are not playing from memory and relying on the score.
                                Thanks Peter for clarifying the meaning of "sight reading". In Spanish it is lectura a primera vista, literally "first sight reading".

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X