Originally posted by urtextmeister:
Thanks for identifying the quote. I never would have guessed Peter Warlock. I have come across him a few times before. I knew about the dual identity, but never heard about the occult business. Very intriguing.
It is a beautiful quotation and I half agree with it. Yes, some music does seem transcend all historical restrictions and speak to us directly, but doesn't our awareness of the historical context influence how we listen to music?
And here is a more inflammatory question: Is it wise bury ourselves so deeply in the music of Beethoven who helped define the early nineteenth century and possibly ignore those who are defining our own struggling century?
Yes, there is more rap and hip-hop in music stores than Beethoven and Max Reger. Should we find that surprising? Why should we expect sonata form to be as meaningful for the average person as a two-minute piece about crime, sex and drug abuse with the ubiquitous electronic sounds that accompany it?
I had a professor once who shamed us because we didn't rush out to see the latest Phillip Glass premiere. She compared it to having the opportunity to see the first performance of Monteverdi's Orfeo and turning it down.
Do we have a responsibility to acknowledge the music that reflects our time? Can we afford to dismiss it in favor of music written for a handful of counts and dukes?
(I am deeply into the role of devil's advocate right now and enjoying it).
Thanks for identifying the quote. I never would have guessed Peter Warlock. I have come across him a few times before. I knew about the dual identity, but never heard about the occult business. Very intriguing.
It is a beautiful quotation and I half agree with it. Yes, some music does seem transcend all historical restrictions and speak to us directly, but doesn't our awareness of the historical context influence how we listen to music?
And here is a more inflammatory question: Is it wise bury ourselves so deeply in the music of Beethoven who helped define the early nineteenth century and possibly ignore those who are defining our own struggling century?
Yes, there is more rap and hip-hop in music stores than Beethoven and Max Reger. Should we find that surprising? Why should we expect sonata form to be as meaningful for the average person as a two-minute piece about crime, sex and drug abuse with the ubiquitous electronic sounds that accompany it?
I had a professor once who shamed us because we didn't rush out to see the latest Phillip Glass premiere. She compared it to having the opportunity to see the first performance of Monteverdi's Orfeo and turning it down.
Do we have a responsibility to acknowledge the music that reflects our time? Can we afford to dismiss it in favor of music written for a handful of counts and dukes?
(I am deeply into the role of devil's advocate right now and enjoying it).
I don't understand your point about the historical context influencing the way we listen - when I first heard a Haydn symphony I was a child, I had no concept of when the work was written, knowledge of the composer or what a symphony was, but I was moved by the music and sensed something great. The quote also deals with this by pointing out that things such as sonata form and dates are only of significance to a music student.
I don't dismiss anything in favour of anything else - I simply listen to what to me is of value whenever it was written, be it Gesualdo or Bartok. It is the quality of any work of art that should be the determining factor, not its date of origin.
------------------
'Man know thyself'
Comment